- Inconsistent checking across different evaluators
- Subjective feedback without clear mark justification
- Unclear understanding of why marks were awarded or deducted
- Over-dependence on individual mentors with varying standards
Evaluate Your UPSC Mains Answers with Examiner-Style Consistency
Structured evaluation aligned with UPSC marking principles. Every mark is explained. Feedback is actionable and specific. Focus on consistency, not opinion.
Why Most Answer Evaluations Fail
How Our Evaluation Is Different
Question Understanding
Questions are analyzed for directives (e.g. examine, analyze, critically evaluate). Evaluation weights adjust based on directive and demand. Focus is on what the question demands, not generic content.
Structured Evaluation
Separate assessment of introduction, body, conclusion, and examples. Structure and content depth are evaluated independently. Missing dimensions lead to defined penalties.
Deterministic Scoring
Fixed and transparent scoring rules. Explicit penalties and bonuses. No random or subjective mark variation.
You Always Know Why You Got Your Marks
Directive-aware scoring weights adjust based on question type
Normalized scoring for consistency across evaluations
Clear penalties and bonuses with explicit calculations
Examiner-style justification explaining mark calculation
No random scoring
No black-box evaluation
Every mark is explainable
Designed specifically for UPSC Mains answer-writing discipline
See It In Action
View a real sample evaluation with full breakdown and clear mark justification.
View Sample EvaluationEvaluate your answer the way UPSC expects.
This evaluation reflects structured, UPSC-aligned marking logic. It does not claim to predict final UPSC marks, but explains how marks are logically earned or lost.
Evaluate your answer the way UPSC expects.