Governance, Resource Rights, and Development Challenges in Tribal Areas
Environment & Ecology
- PYQs8
- Articles1
Background
This concept is crucial for understanding the practical aspects of social justice, environmental governance, and economic development in India. It examines the gap between policy intent and implementation, the role of local self-governance (Gram Sabhas), and the socio-environmental impacts of industrialization on vulnerable populations. Relevant for GS-II (Governance, Social Justice) and GS-III (Environment, Economy).
Tribal communities in India face significant challenges related to governance, the protection of their traditional land and forest rights, and the impact of development projects. Despite legal frameworks like the Forest Rights Act (FRA) and PESA, their effective implementation is often hampered, leading to conflicts over resource control and the erosion of tribal autonomy.
Facts & tables
- Forest Rights Act (FRA), 2006
- Aims to recognize and vest forest rights and occupation in forest dwelling Scheduled Tribes and other traditional forest dwellers.
- Panchayats (Extension to Scheduled Areas) Act (PESA), 1996
- Empowers Gram Sabhas in Scheduled Areas with significant powers, especially over natural resources and development plans.
- Subversion of Gram Sabha Rights
- The article highlights instances where decisions of Gram Sabhas are overridden, particularly concerning mining projects.
- Resource Conflicts
- Ongoing struggles in regions like Sijimali (Odisha) and Hasdeo (Chhattisgarh) against bauxite and coal mining, threatening sacred tribal lands and forests.
| Legislation | Primary Objective | Challenges Highlighted |
|---|---|---|
| Forest Rights Act (FRA), 2006 | Recognize and vest forest rights of forest dwellers | Sabotage, non-implementation, displacement |
| PESA Act, 1996 | Empower Gram Sabhas in Scheduled Areas | Subversion of Gram Sabha decisions, lack of autonomy |
| Type | Reference |
|---|---|
| Conceptual area | Welfare Schemes & Social Policies |
| Conceptual area | Federal Structure & Centre-State Relations |
| Body | Role |
|---|---|
| Gram Sabha | Local self-governance body empowered by pesa |
| Ministry of Tribal Affairs | Formulates policies for tribal welfare |
Prelims angle
Prelims angle: Multi-statement analysis
Prelims angle: Factual recall
- FRA (2006) and PESA (1996) are key laws for tribal rights.
- Gram Sabhas' powers often subverted, especially for mining.
- Conflicts over bauxite/coal mining in Odisha/Chhattisgarh.
- Challenges in protecting jal, jangal, zameen.
- Gap between policy intent and ground reality.
| Year | Framing tags |
|---|---|
| 2024 | Statement-based questions, Factual recall |
| 2022 | Factual recall, Institutional roles and functions |
| 2022 | Multi-statement analysis, Factual recall |
| 2021 | Statement-based questions, Factual recall |
| 2020 | Factual recall, Conceptual understanding |
| 2020 | Multi-statement analysis, Factual recall |
| 2019 | Multi-statement analysis, Factual recall |
| 2018 | Multi-statement analysis, Factual recall |
Timeline
-
Welfare Schemes & Social Policies
Conceptual area
-
Federal Structure & Centre-State Relations
Conceptual area
-
Prelims 2018
Multi-statement analysis, Factual recall
-
Prelims 2019
Multi-statement analysis, Factual recall
-
Prelims 2020
Factual recall, Conceptual understanding
-
Prelims 2020
Multi-statement analysis, Factual recall
-
Prelims 2021
Statement-based questions, Factual recall
-
Prelims 2022
Factual recall, Institutional roles and functions
-
Prelims 2022
Multi-statement analysis, Factual recall
-
Prelims 2024
Statement-based questions, Factual recall
-
The majoritarian shadow over Adivasi identity, faith
Despite FRA and PESA, tribal areas face governance challenges, with Gram Sabha rights often subverted. Resource extraction (e.g., mining) leads to conflicts, threatening tribal land, forests, and livelihoods, highlighting a gap in policy implementation and protection of indigenous rights.
See also
No related topics linked yet.
Past papers
2018–2024 · 8 questions
In the news
The majoritarian shadow over Adivasi identity, faith
Despite FRA and PESA, tribal areas face governance challenges, with Gram Sabha rights often subverted. Resource extraction (e.g., mining) leads to conflicts, threatening tribal land, forests, and livelihoods, highlighting a gap in policy implementation and protection of indigenous rights.
Try these PYQs
Consider the following statements:
1. The definition of "Critical Wildlife Habitat" is incorporated in the Forest Rights Act, 2006.
2. For the first time in India, Baigas have been given Habitat Rights.
3. Union Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change officially decides and declares Habitat Rights for Primitive and Vulnerable Tribal Groups in any part of India.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct ?
Statement 1 is correct: The Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act, 2006, commonly known as the Forest Rights Act (FRA), 2006, introduces the concept of Critical Wildlife Habitat (CWH). These are areas within National Parks and Wildlife Sanctuaries that must be kept inviolate to ensure wildlife protection. CWHs can only be declared based on scientific evidence and after completing the due process of rehabilitation and resettlement of affected communities. Statement 2 is correct: In 2015, the Baiga tribal community in Madhya Pradesh became the first to be granted Habitat Rights under the Forest Rights Act, 2006. This recognition allowed them to continue living within the Kanha Tiger Reserve while accessing forest resources for their bonafide livelihood needs. Statement 3 is incorrect: According to the Forest Rights Act, 2006, it is the respective State governments that have the authority to declare and vest Habitat Rights for Primitive Tribal Groups and pre-agricultural communities over critical wildlife habitats, after obtaining consent from the tribal communities and establishing measures for their resettlement and rehabilitation. Hence, correct answer is option (a) 1 and 2 only.
With reference to Indian laws about wildlife protection, consider the following statements:
1. Wild animals are the sole property of the government.
2. When a wild animal is declared protected, such animal is entitled for equal protection whether it is found in protected areas or outside.
3. Apprehension of a protected wild animal becoming a danger to human life is sufficient ground for its capture or killing.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
Statement 1 is incorrect: As per the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972, all wild animals in protected areas are the property of the government. But, Section 42 of Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972 deals with Certificates of Ownership, empowering the Chief Wildlife Warden to issue these for lawfully possessed wild animals or animal articles (trophies, etc.) with a person. This ensures traceability, allowing identification marking and conditions for housing captive animals, and requires owners to surrender such items if no longer desired, with cancellation of the certificate. Statement 2 is correct: The Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972 provides for the protection of wild animals, whether they are found inside or outside the designated protected areas. Statement 3 is incorrect: As per the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972, the capture or killing of a protected wild animal is strictly prohibited, even if it is perceived to be a danger to human life. Special permission is required from the authorities for any such action.
Consider the following statements:
1. As per law, the Compensatory Afforestation Fund Management and Planning Authority exists at both National and State levels.
2. People’s participation is mandatory in the compensatory afforestation programmes carried out under the Compensatory Afforestation Fund Act, 2016.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
Statement 1 is correct: The Compensatory Afforestation Fund Management and Planning Authority (CAMPA) exists at both National and State levels. - National CAMPA Oversees the national-level administration of the Compensatory Afforestation Fund (CAF). It lays down broad guidelines and ensures proper utilisation of funds across states.
- State CAMPA established in each state, manage funds allocated for compensatory afforestation activities within their jurisdiction. Statement 2 is incorrect: The Compensatory Afforestation Fund Act, 2016 does not explicitly mandate people's participation in the compensatory afforestation programmes carried out under the Act. The Act focuses on the management and utilisation of the Compensatory Afforestation Fund but does not have a specific provision for mandatory public participation.
If a particular plant species is placed under Schedule VI of The Wildlife Protection Act, 1972, what is the implication?
* The Wildlife Protection Act, 1972, provides for the protection of wild animals, birds, and plants. It classifies species into six schedules, each offering different levels of protection. * Schedule VI of the Act pertains to certain plants that are prohibited from cultivation and planting without a license. Therefore, If a plant species is listed under Schedule VI, it means a license is required for its cultivation. * The Wild Life (Protection) Amendment Act, 2022 amended the Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972. The amendment reduced the number of schedules from six to four, simplifying wildlife classification and protection levels. Additionally, the Act also aligned the provisions with CITES (Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora) by introducing a separate schedule (Sch. IV) for species covered under CITES.
Which one of the following has been constituted under the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986?
Central Ground Water Authority (CGWA) has been constituted under Section 3 (3) of the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 to regulate and control development and management of groundwater resources in the country. Central Water Commission (CWC) - Established in 1945, the CWC is a technical organization under the Ministry of Jal Shakti. It focuses on water resource planning, development, and management in India, but its legal basis comes from other central government acts. Central Ground Water Board (CGWB) - While it works in close collaboration with the CGWA, the CGWB is a subordinate organization under the Ministry of Jal Shakti, established in 1970. It functions as the technical arm of the CGWA, providing hydrogeological data and technical expertise. National Water Development Agency (NWDA) - This autonomous agency, established in 1982 under the Ministry of Jal Shakti, operates under the Societies Registration Act, 1860. It focuses on resolving interstate water resource disputes, conducting feasibility studies for water resource development projects, and planning water transfer and linking projects.
Show 3 more PYQs
Consider the following statements:
1. 36% of India’s districts are classified as “overexploited” or critical” by the Central Ground Water Authority (CGWA).
2. CGWA was formed under the Environment (Protection) Act.
3. India has the largest area under groundwater irrigation in the world.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
Statement 1 is incorrect: As per the report National Compilation on Dynamic Groundwater Resources of India, 2017 of CGWA, out of the total 6881 assessment units (Blocks/Mandals/ Talukas) in the country, 1186 units in various States (17%) have been categorized as Over-Exploited, 313 units (5%) as Critical, and 972 units (14%) as Semi-Critical. Statement 2 is correct: The CGWA was established in 1997 under Section 3(3) of the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 to regulate and manage groundwater resources. Statement 3 is correct: India has the largest area under groundwater irrigation in the world. This is due to the country's heavy reliance on agriculture, which is predominantly rain-fed. Therefore, the correct answer is B. 2 and 3 only.
Consider the following statements:
Statement-I: The Indian Flying Fox is placed under the "vermin" category in the Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972.
Statement-II: The Indian Flying Fox feeds on the blood of other animals.
Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?
Statement-I is incorrect: Following the Wild Life (Protection) Amendment Act, 2022, the number of schedules was reduced from six to four. Schedule V (the vermin category) was abolished. The Indian Flying Fox is currently listed under Schedule II, providing it with higher protection. It is no longer legally classified as "vermin" under the Act. Statement-II is incorrect: The Indian Flying Fox is one of the largest bats in the world and is a frugivore. Its diet consists of fruits (like mangoes, guavas, and figs) and nectar. It does not feed on blood; "vampire bats" are a different group of species found primarily in Central and South America. Note: None of the option is correct as both options are incorrect, UPSC dropped this question from the final answer key.
Consider the following statements:
**Statement 1:** The United Nations Capital Development Fund (UNCDF) and the Arbor Day Foundation have recently recognized Hyderabad as 2020 Tree City of the World.
**Statement 2:** Hyderabad was selected for the recognition for a year following its commitment to grow and maintain the urban forests.
Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?
Statement 1 is incorrect: Hyderabad was indeed recognized as a Tree City of the World, but not by the UNCDF and Arbor Day Foundation together.
The recognition comes from a joint program by the UN Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) and the Arbor Day Foundation. Statement 2 is correct: Hyderabad was selected as a 2020 Tree City of the World by the Arbor Day Foundation in recognition of the city's commitment to urban forestry, including growing and maintaining its urban forests. Therefore, only the second statement is correct, and the first statement is incorrect.