Current Affairs
Mains issueGS-2News & Analysis24 May 2026

How has the BCCI resisted RTI scrutiny?

Source: thehindu.comOriginal report

Understand the issue · 1/2

Why now

01

The Central Information Commission (CIC) recently ruled that the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) is not a 'public authority' under the Right to Information (RTI) Act, 2005, and therefore cannot be directed to furnish information. The BCCI has consistently argued it is a private, autonomous body registered under the Tamil Nadu Societies Registration Act, 1975, and does not fall under the definition of 'State' as per Article 12 of the Constitution, nor is it 'substantially financed' by the government. This decision overturns an earlier CIC ruling from 2018 and relies on Supreme Court precedents like the Zee Telefilms Ltd. case (2005). Recommendations from bodies like the Justice R.M. Lodha Committee and the Law Commission to bring sports bodies, including BCCI, under RTI have not been legislated.

Core issue

02

The Central Information Commission (CIC) recently ruled that the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) is not a 'public authority' under the Right to Information (RTI) Act, 2005, and therefore cannot be directed to furnish information. The BCCI has consistently argued it is a private, autonomous body registered under the Tamil Nadu Societies Registration Act, 1975, and does not fall under the definition of 'State' as per Article 12 of the Constitution, nor is it 'substantially financed' by the government. This decision overturns an earlier CIC ruling from 2018 and relies on Supreme Court precedents like the Zee Telefilms Ltd. case (2005). Recommendations from bodies like the Justice R.M. Lodha Committee and the Law Commission to bring sports bodies, including BCCI, under RTI have not been legislated.

Continue this issue

Turn the issue into an answer.

Unlock the issue map, answer-use material, grounded Mains PYQ connections and writing practice.

Unlock Mains Current Affairs