Current Affairs
Mains issueGS-2Editorials06 August 2026

NEET and the state’s duty to minimise harm

Source: thehindu.comOriginal report

Understand the issue · 1/2

Why now

01

The article discusses the Supreme Court's recent jurisprudence, particularly in Sukdeb Saha v. State of Andhra Pradesh (2025), which recognized student mental health as part of the right to life under Article 21 and established institutional responsibility for student well-being. It argues that this principle, highlighted by events like the NEET paper leak, should extend to all state-controlled processes for higher education and public employment. The state has a positive duty to create fair systems that minimize foreseeable harm, rather than merely resolving individual controversies, to prevent recurring crises and ensure constitutional obligations are met.

Core issue

02

The article discusses the Supreme Court's recent jurisprudence, particularly in Sukdeb Saha v. State of Andhra Pradesh (2025), which recognized student mental health as part of the right to life under Article 21 and established institutional responsibility for student well-being. It argues that this principle, highlighted by events like the NEET paper leak, should extend to all state-controlled processes for higher education and public employment. The state has a positive duty to create fair systems that minimize foreseeable harm, rather than merely resolving individual controversies, to prevent recurring crises and ensure constitutional obligations are met.

Continue this issue

Turn the issue into an answer.

Unlock the issue map, answer-use material, grounded Mains PYQ connections and writing practice.

Unlock Mains Current Affairs