Trade unions sound alarm over Supreme Court judgment on definition of industry
A recent nine-judge Supreme Court bench judgment has ruled that the expansive 1978 definition of 'industry' (established in the Bangalore Water Supply case with the 'triple test') will not apply to the newly implemented Industrial Relations Code. Trade unions have voiced strong concerns, alleging that this decision narrows the scope of 'industry', potentially excluding many workers from labor protections, and reflects a pro-corporate bias that undermines workers' collective rights and bargaining power. They argue that the judgment leaves crucial questions unresolved and shifts focus from the nature of work to the institutional status of the employer.
A recent nine-judge Supreme Court bench judgment has ruled that the expansive 1978 definition of 'industry' (established in the Bangalore Water Supply case with the 'triple test') will not apply to the newly implemented Industrial Relations Code. Trade unions have voiced strong concerns, alleging that this decision narrows the scope of 'industry', potentially excluding many workers from labor protections, and reflects a pro-corporate bias that undermines workers' collective rights and bargaining power. They argue that the judgment leaves crucial questions unresolved and shifts focus from the nature of work to the institutional status of the employer.
Exam linkage
GS Paper II: Indian Polity & Governance (Judiciary, Government Policies & Interventions, Labour Laws); GS Paper III: Indian Economy (Labour Economics, Industrial Relations).
Syllabus mapping
This topic appears in Mains
Questions on Indian Polity & Governance come up regularly in GS papers. Practice writing an answer — and see exactly what earns marks.
Editorial & Review Process
Every current affairs analysis and practice question on UPSC Practice is researched using authoritative primary sources and reviewed for factual accuracy and syllabus relevance. Read our Editorial Policy.