Mains issueGS-2Editorials22 October 2026

Judicial Language Reform and Gender Sensitivity in Justice Delivery

Aspirants should be able to argue that judicial language reform is a critical aspect of ensuring substantive equality and social justice, requiring not just semantic changes but a deeper engagement with underlying patriarchal assumptions and a commitment to diverse representation within the judiciary.

Source: thehindu.comOriginal report

Understand the issue · 1/2

Why now

The Supreme Court's ongoing initiative, led by the CJI, to revise its Handbook on Combating Gender Stereotypes and the subsequent publication of the 2026 Handbook on Judgments and Gender, along with recent High Court decisions, highlights a critical, ongoing effort to address patriarchal biases in judicial language and practice. This is crucial for ensuring substantive equality and effective justice delivery.

Core issue

The article discusses the Supreme Court of India's ongoing initiative, led by the Chief Justice of India, to reform judicial language through the revision and publication of the 2026 Handbook on Judgments and Gender. This effort aims to combat gender stereotypes and patriarchal biases in judicial pronouncements, moving beyond mere semantic changes to address underlying assumptions. It highlights the Karnataka High Court's progressive decision to replace 'visitation' with 'parenting time' in child custody cases as a positive step. The article acknowledges past failures in implementing gender sensitivity and emphasizes the need for meaningful representation on the Bench and a deeper engagement with social contexts to achieve substantive equality, extending sensitivity to other marginalized communities like persons with disabilities, caste, and tribal groups.

Continue this issue

Turn the issue into an answer.

Unlock the issue map, answer-use material, grounded Mains PYQ connections and writing practice.

Unlock Mains Current Affairs