West Asian Geopolitics and Regional Power Dynamics
The article details how the Iran-US deal has reshaped West Asian geopolitics, causing a rift between the US and Israel, potentially emboldening Iran, and lea...
The article analyzes the perceived decline of U.S. dominance in global affairs, particularly in the context of a speculative U.S.-Iran deal in 2026. It discusses the implications of this deal for West Asian power dynamics, U.S.-Israel relations, the rise of hardliners in Iran, and the potential for renewed regional conflicts and the re-emergence of radical groups, drawing parallels with historical events like the Treaty of Versailles.
Durable syllabus ideas for revision — not article memory.
The article details how the Iran-US deal has reshaped West Asian geopolitics, causing a rift between the US and Israel, potentially emboldening Iran, and lea...
The article highlights the waning influence of the US and the West, exemplified by the Iran deal, signaling a shift towards a more multipolar world where eme...
Previous year Prelims questions on overlapping themes and topics.
India is one of the founding members of the International North-South Transport Corridor (INSTC), a multimodal transportation corridor, which will connect
The International North-South Transport Corridor (INSTC) is a multimodal transport network aimed at boosting trade between India, Central Asia, Russia, and Europe, using a combination of sea, rail, and road routes via Iran. The corridor connects Mumbai → Bandar Abbas (Iran) → Azerbaijan → Russia → Europe, with access to Central Asia.
Consider the following statements:
Statement-I :Israel has established diplomatic relations with some Arab States.
Statement-II :The 'Arab Peace Initiative' Mediated by Saudi Arabia was signed by Israel and Arab League.
Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?
* Statement I is correct: Several Arab states, including Egypt, Jordan, United Arab Emirates, Bahrain, Morocco, and Sudan, have established diplomatic relations with Israel. * Statement II is incorrect: The Arab Peace Initiative, mediated by Saudi Arabia, was endorsed by the Arab League but not signed by Israel. It outlines a path towards peace in exchange for Israeli concessions, but Israel has not formally accepted all its terms.
In the Indian context, what is the implication of ratifying the 'Additional Protocol' with the `International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)'?
India signed the Additional Protocol to the IAEA safeguards agreement on May 15, 2009. An additional protocol to the Safeguards Agreement between the Government of India and the IAEA for the Application of Safeguards to Civilian Nuclear Facilities entered into force on 25 July 2014. Hence option 1 is correct.
Which of the following is not a member of ‘Gulf Cooperation Council’?
The Cooperation Council for the Arab States of the Gulf, originally (and still colloquially) known as the Gulf Cooperation Council, is a regional intergovernmental political and economic union consisting of all Arab states of the Persian Gulf except Iran. Its member states are Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates. The Charter of the Gulf Cooperation Council was signed on 25 May 1981, formally establishing the institution. Hence, option A is the correct answer.
With reference to the United Nations General Assembly, consider the following statements:
1. The UN General Assembly can grant observer status to the non-member States.
2. Inter-governmental organisations can seek observer status in the UN General Assembly.
3. Permanent Observers in the UN General Assembly can maintain missions at the UN headquarters.
Which of the statements given above are correct ?
Statement 1 is correct. The United Nations General Assembly may grant non-member states, international organizations, and other entities Permanent Observer Status. Statement 2 is correct. The General Assembly decided that observer status would be confined to States and intergovernmental organizations whose activities cover matters of interest to the Assembly. Statement 3 is correct. Permanent Observers may participate in the sessions and workings of the General Assembly and maintain missions at the UN Headquarters.
Consider the following statements regarding the India-Africa Forum Summit (IAFS):
1. The summit held in 2015 marked the third edition of the IAFS.
2. The IAFS mechanism was instituted under the leadership of Jawaharlal Nehru in 1951.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
Statement 1 is correct: The Third India-Africa Forum Summit (IAFS-III) was hosted in New Delhi in October 2015. The first and second summits were held in 2008 (New Delhi) and 2011 (Addis Ababa), respectively, making the 2015 event the third edition. Statement 2 is incorrect: The India-Africa Forum Summit was institutionalized in 2008 to serve as the official platform for African-Indian relations. While Jawaharlal Nehru was a pioneer of Afro-Asian solidarity (e.g., the Asian Relations Conference of 1947), the IAFS is a distinct 21st-century initiative and was not established in 1951.
In India, why are some nuclear reactors kept under “IAEA Safeguards” while others are not?
IAEA safeguards are a set of technical safeguards applied by the IAEA to independently verify any nuclear facilities to check if it is not misused or deviated from peaceful uses. IAEA Safeguards are meant to understand if imported/enriched uranium is not used for non-peaceful purposes. New reactors under IAEA safeguards The decision will be based on the source of uranium.
What is the importance of developing Chabahar Port by India?
India signed a deal to develop the Chabahar port with Iran. Apart from the bilateral agreement between India and Iran, a trilateral transit and trade corridor deal was also signed by India, Iran and Afghanistan which would ensure easy movement of goods between the three countries, bypassing Pakistan. The Chabahar port is situated in South Eastern part of Iran and on the northern coast of Gulf of Oman It is surrounded by Afghanistan in the North, Pakistan in the North-East and India in the East. The location of the Chabahar port is of strategic importance to India in linking trade routes from the Indian Ocean to Afghanistan, Central Asia and also to Europe; thereby avoiding a land route through Pakistan.
Consider the following countries -
1. China
2. France
3. India
4. Israel
5. Pakistan
Which among the above are Nuclear Weapons States as recognized by the Treaty on the Non-proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, commonly known as Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT)?
The Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) recognizes five states as nuclear-weapon states:
- The United States, - Russia, - The United Kingdom, - France,
- China (also the five permanent members of the United Nations Security Council). Four other states are known or believed to possess nuclear weapons India, Pakistan and North Korea have openly tested and declared that they possess nuclear weapons, while Israel has had a policy of opacity regarding its nuclear weapons program.
In the Mekong-Ganga Cooperation, an initiative of six countries, which of the following is/are not participant/ participants?
1. Bangladesh
2. Cambodia
3. China
4. Myanmar
5. Thailand
Select the correct answer using the code given below.
All 6 participants of the Mekong-Ganga Cooperation are member countries bordering the basins of the Mekong and Ganga rivers, aiming to collaborate on various initiatives. These countries are: - India - Cambodia - Laos - Myanmar - Thailand - Vietnam Hence, China & Bangladesh are not part of the Mekong-Ganga Corporation.
Previous year Mains questions mapped to overlapping GS syllabus topics.
"The reform process in the United Nations remains unresolved, because of the delicate imbalance of East and West and entanglement of the USA vs. Russo-Chinese alliance." Examine and critically evaluate the East-West policy confrontations in this regard.
"Energy security constitutes the dominant kingpin of India's foreign policy, and is linked with India's overarching influence in Middle Eastern countries." How would you integrate energy security with India's foreign policy trajectories in the coming years?
Examine the evolving pattern of Centre-State financial relations in the context of planned development in India. How far have the recent reforms impacted the fiscal federalism in India?
"Constitutional morality is the fulcrum which acts as an essential check upon the high functionaries and citizens alike…."
In view of the above observation of the Supreme Court, explain the concept of constitutional morality and its application to ensure balance between judicial independence and judicial accountability in India.
"With the waning of globalization, post-Cold War world is becoming a site of sovereign nationalism." Elucidate.
How can India achieve energy independence through clean technology by 2047? How can biotechnology play a crucial role in this endeavour?
MCQs drawn from today's published current affairs.
Statement 1 is correct: The article states, 'The agreement also reportedly contains an important pledge by Iran not to develop a nuclear weapon.' Statement 2 is incorrect: The article mentions a plan for $300 billion for reconstruction, but clarifies, 'the U.S. has since declared that no U.S. funds would flow directly to Iran.' This commitment possibly refers to the release of frozen Iranian assets. Statement 3 is incorrect: The article states it was followed by 'the lifting of U.S. oil sanctions on Iran and the issuance of a 60-day waiver authorising the sale and transport of Iranian crude oil and petroleum products.' This indicates a temporary waiver, not an immediate and permanent lifting of all sanctions.
The article states the 1919 Treaty of Versailles 'is widely regarded as having imposed humiliating terms on Germany'. For the 2026 deal, it notes 'the enormity of the setback to the image of the U.S. resulting from its coming to terms with Iran' and critics termed it the 'surrender blunder', with 'Goliath having been worsted'. The headline 'Versailles II: Trump rushes where historians would dread to tread' further emphasizes this perceived negative outcome for the U.S., drawing a parallel with the perceived humiliation of Germany in 1919. While both were signed in Versailles (Option A), the primary reason for the *comparison* in terms of historical significance and impact is the perceived humiliation/setback for a major power.
All four statements are explicitly mentioned in the article as contributing factors: 1. 'The rise of China... driven by its technological and innovative capabilities' 2. 'the growing prominence of certain “middle powers”' 3. 'in the course of the Iran-Iraq war (1980-1988), Iran’s Islamic regime demonstrated remarkable endurance, resilience, and determination... few expected that a country such as Iran would effectively deal a mortal blow to the image of the U.S.' 4. 'Concerns had, no doubt, grown about the U.S.’s structural vulnerabilities' Therefore, all four factors have contributed to the perceived waning of U.S. and Western supremacy.
Discuss the factors contributing to the perceived decline of U.S. dominance, the specific terms and perception of the U.S.-Iran deal, and its likely impact on regional power equations and key alliances in West Asia, particularly U.S.-Israel relations.
Explain the reasons for the 'Versailles II' comparison, discuss the factors contributing to the waning Western dominance, and elaborate on the broader implications for the international order, drawing on historical parallels.