Syllabus-mapped editorials, PIB updates, reports, judgments, and policy news for prelims and mains revision.
The article, titled '25 years on, America’s response to 9/11 is its biggest self-inflicted hurt,' likely analyzes the long-term negative consequences and unintended outcomes of the United States' foreign policy and security decisions in the two and a half decades following the September 11, 2001 attacks. It suggests a critical perspective on how these responses have ultimately harmed American interests.
Read analysisThe article analyzes how the U.S. 'global war on terrorism' post-9/11, marked by military interventions in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Libya, paradoxically eroded American unipolarity. It details the rise of new terrorist groups like ISIS, the strengthening of regional rivals such as Iran, and the destabilization of West Asia and North Africa. The article argues that despite its unilateral actions, the U.S. is increasingly at odds with an emerging multipolar world order, with China and Russia challenging its influence, and highlights the long-term geopolitical consequences of these interventions up to 2026.
Read analysisThe article analyzes how the United States-led 'global war on terror' inadvertently empowered Iran, transforming it from a contained state into a dominant regional power. By toppling hostile regimes in Afghanistan (Taliban) and Iraq (Saddam Hussein), the US eliminated Iran's strategic adversaries and created power vacuums. These events, coupled with the rise of sectarian conflicts and groups like ISIS, allowed Iran to consolidate influence through proxy networks (the 'Axis of Resistance') across Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, and Yemen, thereby achieving strategic advantages contrary to stated US objectives.
Read analysisAll 3 articles loaded.
UPSC MAINS PREP
Upload a handwritten answer on any of these topics and get examiner-style feedback in under 2 minutes.
Upload your answer